American Arms


Protecting the independence of American industries


CSG Accused of Hiding NATO Corruption Probe Ahead of IPO

Source: https://www.ftm.eu/articles/europe-defence-giant-czechoslovak-group-csg-entangled-nato-corruption-scandal

European defence giant entangled in NATO corruption scandal

Czechoslovak Group (CSG) recently celebrated the largest-ever initial public offering for a defence company. But it failed to disclose that one of its subsidiaries had been suspended by NATO as part of a major corruption investigation. Investors told Follow the Money that CSG should have made the information public before its listing in Amsterdam.

A major European defence company has been embroiled in a corruption scandal after NATO suspended one of its subsidiaries, Follow the Money and its media partners can reveal.

Czechoslovak Group (CSG) made headlines in January when it listed in Amsterdam, achieving the world’s largest-ever initial public offering for a defence firm.

However, the company failed to disclose that its Spanish subsidiary – Fábrica de Municiones de Granada (FMG) – had been blacklisted by the NATO Support and Procurement Agency (NSPA) last July.

The NSPA is at the heart of a major graft investigation, with current and former employees suspected of accepting bribes.

Kickbacks worth potentially millions of euros were allegedly paid by defence contractors or middlemen to land NSPA contracts to supply the military alliance and its 32 member states.

Internal documents obtained by Follow the Money, La Lettre, Le Soir, and Knack show that FMG – an ammunition manufacturer based in southern Spain – was temporarily barred from bidding for new contracts in July as part of the corruption probe.

When the suspension took effect, FMG held at least three NSPA contracts for tank artillery. The ban was originally meant to last four months, but has since been extended indefinitely.

Investors left in the dark

There was no mention of FMG’s suspension in the 728-page prospectus that CSG published days before it went public in January.

Under EU financial regulations, even the threat of a criminal investigation requires companies to inform investors if the information is considered of material importance.

The issue is whether the investigation and temporary suspension of FMG could be significant enough to influence investors’ decisions on buying CSG shares.

It’s not just the possible financial consequences that should be taken into account, but also the potential reputational damage, according to several experts in the field.

The Dutch shareholders association VEB said that investors “would have liked to have known in advance” about FMG’s suspension.

That view was echoed by two investors who spoke to Follow the Money on condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the matter.

In response to emailed questions, CSG spokesman Andrej Čírtek said that the suspension was “unfounded”.

Čírtek said that FMG had conducted a thorough forensic legal audit of all its dealings with the NSPA in recent years and “found no reason whatsoever to conclude there had been any irregularities or unlawful dealings”.

“To the best of FMG’s knowledge and based on the internal audit results, FMG believes it has done nothing wrong, committed no wrongdoing, or taken any part in any uncompliant activities, that could have led to said suspension,” he added.

Reputational risk

Founded in 2019, FMG has its roots in the centuries-old tradition of ammunition production in the southern Spanish city of Granada.

The company was taken over by the Slovakian MSM Group – part of CSG – in 2020.

FMG produces large-calibre shells for artillery and tanks – ammunition in high demand since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. As a result, its workforce has reportedly tripled in recent years. In 2024, FMG reported a turnover of €163 million and a profit of €22 million.

On 31 July 2025, the NSPA suspended FMG along with Israel’s largest defence company, Elbit Systems.

An internal letter by a senior NSPA manager – a copy of which was seen by Follow the Money – said there were “serious allegations indicating that it is likely the suppliers engaged in sanctionable practices, including irregularities in the award of contracts”.

Security and Defence

Europe is investing heavily to ramp up its security. FTM takes a close look at how the money is being spent.

CSG told Follow the Money that its repeated inquiries to the NSPA about the suspension of FMG have gone unanswered, leaving the company to rely on media reports for information.

Despite the blacklisting, the Spanish firm can still sell directly to individual NATO member states. Those countries spend much more on defence than the NSPA itself.

“Given the current market situation, and the fact that the NSPA is only one of many FMG customers, the suspension has had no impact on the financial situation or business prospects of FMG [or its parent company CSG],” said Čírtek of CSG.

However, he said that CSG was concerned about the impact the suspension could have on its reputation.

Despite repeated requests, NATO and the Belgian Public Prosecutor’s Office – which is investigating the corruption case – have not commented on FMG’s blacklisting.

The findings follow last year’s investigation by Follow the Money and media partners, which uncovered the scale of the scandal.

It revealed how two US probes into the NSPA were abruptly and inexplicably dropped in July, raising concerns about political interference.

Separately, leaked documents exposed internal turmoil at the procurement agency, with senior officials having accused NSPA General Manager Stacy Cummings of favouritism, failing to investigate corruption, and unduly interfering in their work.

Read more

Interview: CSG’s Shadow Deals and Broken Promises March 19, 2026

A founding insider exposes troubling practices inside Europe’s rising defense giant CSG—from concealed minority stakes during its IPO to alleged last-minute reversals and undervalued buyout offers. The revelations raise serious questions about transparency, investor trust, and whether global capital markets are being asked to bankroll a system built on backroom maneuvering rather than fair play.

Hidden Stakeholder: Why Europe’s CSG Raises Red Flags for America’s Defense Industry March 19, 2026

A newly uncovered dispute inside Europe’s Czechoslovak Group (CSG) is exposing serious transparency failures at the heart of one of the continent’s fastest-growing arms manufacturers. A previously undisclosed minority co-owner—armed with extraordinary control rights—has surfaced with a demand worth billions, raising questions about what investors were never told ahead of the company’s high-profile IPO.
At issue is more than just internal conflict. The failure to disclose a powerful stakeholder and a looming multi-billion-dollar buyout obligation points to a pattern of opacity, conflicting valuations, and potential investor misrepresentation. These are not minor oversights—they are systemic warning signs about how CSG operates behind the scenes.
For the United States, the implications are clear. At a time when Washington is actively prioritizing domestic production, supply chain resilience, and strategic independence under an “America First” defense framework , the rise of opaque foreign defense conglomerates presents a direct challenge. Allowing companies with questionable governance and hidden liabilities into the U.S. defense ecosystem risks undermining the integrity and security of America’s industrial base.

CSG Accused of Hiding NATO Corruption Probe Ahead of IPO March 10, 2026

A new investigation by Follow the Money raises serious questions about the conduct of European defense conglomerate Czechoslovak Group (CSG) following its high-profile stock market debut in Amsterdam. According to the report, the company allegedly failed to disclose a critical fact before its IPO: one of its subsidiaries had been suspended by NATO amid a corruption investigation. Investors may have purchased shares without knowing the full scope of the risks tied to the company’s operations. Critics say the case highlights troubling transparency issues in parts of the European defense sector and raises concerns about how foreign defense firms handle accountability to shareholders and partners. The controversy is likely to fuel debate over whether defense contracts and strategic investments should prioritize trusted American companies and allies who operate under stricter standards and transparency.